🔊 Thermoacoustic Stirling Refrigerator
Evaluate thermoacoustic cryocoolers and Stirling refrigerators: acoustic cooling heat lift (Watts), acoustic work input, thermal penetration depth (delta_k), and COP using Swift model.
⚡ Fortran 90 Engine
Double Precision (IEEE 754)
✓ ISO / ASME Validated
📊 Solver Telemetry
● ACTIVE
👁️ Consultations
20
⚡ Calculs faits
15
💾 Téléchargements
317
📦 Code Fortran
11.4 KB
📅 Mise en service
Jun 2026
⏱️ Latence
< 1 ms
🔊 Acoustic Resonator Tube & Thermoacoustic Stack Heat Pumping
Real-time visual simulation: Standing acoustic wave oscillating gas parcels across parallel stack plates creating temperature gradient📝 Configuration & Presets
🎈 Helium Refrigerator (20 bar)
🛰️ Spacecraft He-Xe Cryocooler (150K)
☀️ Solar Air Cooler (10 bar)
🧪 Lab Argon Demo (8 bar)
Swift Thermoacoustic Formulation:
• Thermal Penetration Depth: δκ = √(2 k / (ρ cp ω)) [mm]
• Optimal Stack Spacing: y₀ ≈ 2 - 4 δκ
• Acoustic Power Work: Ẇ₂ ∝ Astack · δκ · ω · p₁² / (ρ a²)
• Coefficient of Performance: COP = Q̇c / Ẇ₂
• Thermal Penetration Depth: δκ = √(2 k / (ρ cp ω)) [mm]
• Optimal Stack Spacing: y₀ ≈ 2 - 4 δκ
• Acoustic Power Work: Ẇ₂ ∝ Astack · δκ · ω · p₁² / (ρ a²)
• Coefficient of Performance: COP = Q̇c / Ẇ₂
📊 Thermoacoustic Results
📊 Output Summary
Acoustic Cooling Heat Lift (Q̇c)
1.50 Watts
Cooling COP: 1.500 | Acoustic Work: 1.00 W
δκ = 0.090 mm
Acoustic Pressure Amplitude
20.0 kPa
Drive ratio = 2.5 %
Thermal Penetration (δκ)
0.090 mm
Optimal spacing = 0.27 mm
Viscous Penetration (δν)
0.074 mm
Boundary layer loss
Fraction of Carnot COP
15.6 %
COPCarnot = 9.64
📈 Acoustic Cooling Lift Q_c (W) vs Drive Ratio D_r (%)
📉 Coefficient of Performance (COP) vs Frequency (Hz)
================================================================= THERMOFLUIDCALC — THERMOACOUSTIC STIRLING REFRIGERATOR REPORT ================================================================= Case Title : University Demonstration Argon Standing-Wave Resonator Gas & Resonator Properties : Argon (Ar) — Low Acoustic Velocity Acoustic State Parameters : Mean Press = 8.0 bar, Freq = 95.0 Hz, Drive Ratio = 2.5 % (p1 = 20.0 kPa) Thermal Boundaries & Stack : Cold Tc = 270.0 K, Hot Th = 298.0 K, Area = 20.0 cm2, Length = 6.0 cm ----------------------------------------------------------------- ACOUSTIC COOLING LIFT (Qc) : 1.500 Watts ACOUSTIC POWER INPUT (W2) : 1.000 Watts COEFFICIENT OF PERF (COP) : 1.5000 (15.6% of Carnot COP = 9.64) Thermal Penetration (delta): 0.0899 mm (Optimal plate half-gap = 0.270 mm) Viscous Penetration (delta): 0.0738 mm =================================================================
📘 Calculation Methodology & Thermoacoustic Standards
Thermoacoustic Heat Pumping Effect
Oscillating gas parcels experience cyclical compression, displacement, and thermal relaxation with the solid stack wall, pumping heat from the cold heat exchanger (CHX) toward the hot heat exchanger (HHX).
No Moving Parts & Noble Gas Operation
Eliminates pistons, valves, and synthetic fluorinated refrigerants. Uses inert helium or argon gas with near-infinite operational lifetimes for space missions and green cooling.
Key Engineering Assumptions
- Linear Rott acoustic standing-wave approximation ($D_r \le 10\%$).
- Short-stack approximation with parallel plate stack matrix.
- Applicable to electronics cooling, space cryogenics, and waste heat refrigeration.