📐 FTCS Heat Equation Stability
Analyze numerical stability limits for 1D/2D transient diffusion solvers using the FTCS scheme.
⚡ Fortran 90 Engine
Double Precision (IEEE 754)
✓ ISO / ASME Validated
Cfd
📊 Solver Telemetry
● ACTIVE
📥 Material Properties & Grid Spacing
📖 Heat Conduction Stability:
$$\alpha = \frac{k}{\rho c_p}, \quad \text{Fo}_{\Delta} = \alpha \Delta t \left(\frac{1}{\Delta x^2} + \frac{1}{\Delta y^2} + \frac{1}{\Delta z^2}\right)$$
$$\text{FTCS Explicit Limit: } \text{Fo}_{\Delta} \le \frac{1}{2 d}, \quad \Delta t_{\text{max}} = \frac{1}{2 d\, \alpha\, \sum \Delta x_i^{-2}}$$
UNSTABLE ⚠️
Stability Status
0.4638
Grid Fourier Number ($\text{Fo}_\Delta$)
5.39e-4 s
Max Time Step ($\Delta t_{\text{max}}$)
1.16e-4
Diffusivity $\alpha$ [$\text{m}^2/\text{s}$]
⚠️
Thermal Transient Solver Diagnostic
For 2D FTCS Explicit (Forward Euler) with thermal diffusivity $\alpha = \mathbf{1.160e-4\ \text{m}^2/\text{s}}$, the grid cell diffusion time scale is $t_{\text{diff}} = \mathbf{2.16e-3\ \text{s}}$.
The time step $\Delta t = 5.00e-4\ \text{s}$ exceeds the critical limit ($\Delta t_{\text{max}} = 5.39e-4\ \text{s}$). The explicit solver will produce unphysical negative temperatures and blow up. Reduce $\Delta t$ by at least -7%.
📈 Grid Fourier Number $\text{Fo}_\Delta$ vs Time Step $\Delta t$
Dashed Red: $\text{Fo}_{\text{crit}} = 0.250$🔍 View Raw GNU Fortran Double-Precision Solver Output
============================================================ HEAT EQUATION STABILITY CALCULATOR ============================================================ --- INPUT CONDITIONS ---------------------------------------- alpha (diffusivity) = 1.159555E-04 m2/s k (conductivity) = 4.000000E+02 W/m.K rho = 8960.0000 kg/m3 cp = 385.0000 J/kg.K T_init = 300.00 K T_bc = 500.00 K --- GRID INFORMATION ---------------------------------------- dx = 5.000000E-04 m dy = 5.000000E-04 m Dimensions = 2D --- SCHEME INFORMATION -------------------------------------- Scheme = FTCS Explicit Stability type = Conditionally Stable Fo_max (limit) = 0.250000 Accuracy order = O(dt,dx2) --- TIME STEP ----------------------------------------------- dt (used) = 5.000000E-04 s dt_max (FTCS stable) = 2.695000E-04 s --- FOURIER NUMBERS ----------------------------------------- Fo (total) = 0.463822 rx = alpha*dt/dx2 = 0.231911 ry = alpha*dt/dy2 = 0.231911 Fo_max (scheme) = 0.250000 --- STABILITY STATUS ---------------------------------------- STATUS = UNSTABLE Margin = -85.53 % --- DIFFUSION CHARACTERISTICS ------------------------------- t_cell = dx2/alpha = 2.156000E-03 s Penetration depth = 4.815713E-04 m Pen. depth / dx = 0.9631 t_diff (10*dx domain) = 2.156000E-01 s Steps to t_diff = 431.2 --- ALL SCHEMES COMPARISON ---------------------------------- Scheme Fo_max Stable? Order -------------------------------------------------------- FTCS 0.2500 NO O(dt,dx2) Implicit BE unlimited YES O(dt,dx2) Crank-Nicolson unlimited YES O(dt2,dx2) DuFort-Frankel unlimited YES* O(dt2,dx2) --- PROFILE vs dt ------------------------------------------ dt Fo rx Status pen_depth N_steps -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.3475E-05 0.012500 0.006250 STABLE 7.9057E-05 1.6000E+04 4.0771E-05 0.037821 0.018910 STABLE 1.3751E-04 5.2881E+03 6.8066E-05 0.063141 0.031571 STABLE 1.7768E-04 3.1675E+03 9.5362E-05 0.088462 0.044231 STABLE 2.1031E-04 2.2609E+03 1.2266E-04 0.113782 0.056891 STABLE 2.3852E-04 1.7577E+03 1.4995E-04 0.139103 0.069551 STABLE 2.6373E-04 1.4378E+03 1.7725E-04 0.164423 0.082212 STABLE 2.8673E-04 1.2164E+03 2.0454E-04 0.189744 0.094872 STABLE 3.0801E-04 1.0541E+03 2.3184E-04 0.215064 0.107532 STABLE 3.2792E-04 9.2996E+02 2.5913E-04 0.240385 0.120192 STABLE 3.4669E-04 8.3200E+02 2.8643E-04 0.265705 0.132853 UNSTABLE 3.6449E-04 7.5271E+02 3.1373E-04 0.291026 0.145513 UNSTABLE 3.8146E-04 6.8722E+02 3.4102E-04 0.316346 0.158173 UNSTABLE 3.9771E-04 6.3222E+02 3.6832E-04 0.341667 0.170833 UNSTABLE 4.1332E-04 5.8537E+02 3.9561E-04 0.366987 0.183494 UNSTABLE 4.2836E-04 5.4498E+02 4.2291E-04 0.392308 0.196154 UNSTABLE 4.4289E-04 5.0980E+02 4.5020E-04 0.417628 0.208814 UNSTABLE 4.5696E-04 4.7889E+02 4.7750E-04 0.442949 0.221474 UNSTABLE 4.7061E-04 4.5152E+02 5.0479E-04 0.468269 0.234135 UNSTABLE 4.8387E-04 4.2710E+02 5.3209E-04 0.493590 0.246795 UNSTABLE 4.9678E-04 4.0519E+02 5.5939E-04 0.518910 0.259455 UNSTABLE 5.0937E-04 3.8542E+02 5.8668E-04 0.544231 0.272115 UNSTABLE 5.2165E-04 3.6749E+02 6.1398E-04 0.569551 0.284776 UNSTABLE 5.3364E-04 3.5115E+02 6.4127E-04 0.594872 0.297436 UNSTABLE 5.4538E-04 3.3621E+02 6.6857E-04 0.620192 0.310096 UNSTABLE 5.5686E-04 3.2248E+02 6.9586E-04 0.645513 0.322756 UNSTABLE 5.6812E-04 3.0983E+02 7.2316E-04 0.670833 0.335417 UNSTABLE 5.7915E-04 2.9814E+02 7.5045E-04 0.696154 0.348077 UNSTABLE 5.8998E-04 2.8729E+02 7.7775E-04 0.721474 0.360737 UNSTABLE 6.0061E-04 2.7721E+02 8.0504E-04 0.746795 0.373397 UNSTABLE 6.1106E-04 2.6781E+02 8.3234E-04 0.772115 0.386058 UNSTABLE 6.2134E-04 2.5903E+02 8.5964E-04 0.797436 0.398718 UNSTABLE 6.3144E-04 2.5080E+02 8.8693E-04 0.822756 0.411378 UNSTABLE 6.4139E-04 2.4309E+02 9.1423E-04 0.848077 0.424038 UNSTABLE 6.5118E-04 2.3583E+02 9.4152E-04 0.873397 0.436699 UNSTABLE 6.6083E-04 2.2899E+02 9.6882E-04 0.898718 0.449359 UNSTABLE 6.7034E-04 2.2254E+02 9.9611E-04 0.924038 0.462019 UNSTABLE 6.7972E-04 2.1644E+02 1.0234E-03 0.949359 0.474679 UNSTABLE 6.8897E-04 2.1067E+02 1.0507E-03 0.974679 0.487340 UNSTABLE 6.9810E-04 2.0520E+02 1.0780E-03 1.000000 0.500000 UNSTABLE 7.0711E-04 2.0000E+02 --- EQUATIONS USED ------------------------------------------ Fo = alpha*dt/dx^2 (Fourier number, Eq. 2.80) FTCS: Fo <= 1/(2*ndim) 1D: Fo<=0.5, 2D: Fo<=0.25, 3D: Fo<=1/6 dt_max = Fo_max / (alpha * sum(1/dxi^2)) Penetration depth = 2*sqrt(alpha*t) ============================================================
📘 Calculation Methodology: Heat Equation Explicit Stability & Fourier Limit
Mathematical Model & Theory
Explicit finite difference integration of transient diffusion requires the mesh Fourier number $Fo$ to satisfy the maximum principle to avoid non-physical oscillations:
$$Fo = \frac{\alpha \Delta t}{\Delta x^2} \le \frac{1}{2 d} \quad (d = \text{spatial dimensions})$$
$$\text{1D: } Fo \le 0.5, \quad \text{2D: } Fo \le 0.25, \quad \text{3D: } Fo \le 0.167$$
Assumptions
- Explicit Forward-Time Central-Space (FTCS) finite differencing.
- Constant thermal diffusivity $lpha = k/( ho c_p)$.
Academic References
- Incropera, F. P. et al.: Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer, Ch. 5.
- Patankar, S. V.: Numerical Heat Transfer, CRC Press.
Worked Engineering Example
Problem Statement:
An aluminium plate ($\alpha = 8.4 \times 10^{-5}\text{ m}^2/\text{s}$) has 2D grid spacing $\Delta x = 2.0\text{ mm}$. Calculate maximum stable time step.
Step-by-step Solution:
1. $\Delta t_{max} = 0.25 \times (0.002)^2 / (8.4 \times 10^{-5}) = 1.0 \times 10^{-6} / (8.4 \times 10^{-5}) \approx 0.0119\text{ s}$.
Final Result:
Maximum stable time step is $\mathbf{11.9\text{ ms}}$.
An aluminium plate ($\alpha = 8.4 \times 10^{-5}\text{ m}^2/\text{s}$) has 2D grid spacing $\Delta x = 2.0\text{ mm}$. Calculate maximum stable time step.
Step-by-step Solution:
1. $\Delta t_{max} = 0.25 \times (0.002)^2 / (8.4 \times 10^{-5}) = 1.0 \times 10^{-6} / (8.4 \times 10^{-5}) \approx 0.0119\text{ s}$.
Final Result:
Maximum stable time step is $\mathbf{11.9\text{ ms}}$.