🧬 Gas Permeation Membrane Separation

Design hollow fiber and spiral-wound gas separation membranes for CO2/CH4 biogas upgrading, H2 recovery, and N2 enrichment using cross-flow permeation models.

⚡ Fortran 90 Engine Double Precision (IEEE 754) ✓ ISO / ASME Validated
📊 Solver Telemetry ● ACTIVE
👁️ Consultations 28
⚡ Calculs faits 23
💾 Téléchargements 282 📦 Code Fortran 6.4 KB
📅 Mise en service Jun 2026
⏱️ Latence < 1 ms
⚡ Outils & Rapports :
💾 Télécharger Fortran 90

🔬 Hollow Fiber Membrane Shell-and-Lumen Gas Permeation

Real-time visual simulation of fast gas molecules diffusing across hollow fibers into permeate lumen

📝 Configuration & Presets

🌱 Biogas (CO₂/CH₄, α=35) ⚡ H₂ Syngas Recovery (α=60) 💨 N₂ Air Separation (O₂/N₂) 🏭 Carbon Capture (Vacuum Perm)
🧪 Membrane Permeance & Selectivity
1 GPU = 10⁻⁶ cm³(STP)/(cm²·s·cmHg)
⚡ Operating Pressures & Flow Rates
Industrial range: 0.20 to 0.60
Gas Permeation Formulations:
• Flux: Ji = Qi · (Ph xi − Pl yi) [mol/(m²·s)]
• Selectivity: α = QA / QB
• Stage Cut: θ = Permeate / Feed
• Membrane Area: Am = (P · yp) / [ QA · ΔPlm ] [m²]

📊 Membrane Sizing Results

📊 Output Summary
💾 Fortran Source

Required Membrane Surface Area
Am = 172.7 m²
Permeate Purity: 25.2 % Fast Gas | Retentate: 88.0 % Slow Gas
θ = 15 %
Permeate Stream Flow Rate 225.0 Nm³/h yp = 0.252 (Recovery = 27.0 %)
Retentate Product Flow Rate 1275.0 Nm³/h xr,slow = 88.0 % (Recovery = 87.0 %)
Transmembrane Pressure Ratio 0.057 ΔP = 3.3 bar
Specific Membrane Productivity 1.30 Nm³/(m²·h) Per unit membrane area

📈 Permeate Purity (%) vs Stage Cut θ (%)

📉 Required Area A_m (m²) vs Feed Pressure P_h (bar)

=================================================================
 THERMOFLUIDCALC — GAS PERMEATION MEMBRANE ANALYSIS REPORT
=================================================================
Case Title                 : Post-Combustion Flue Gas Carbon Capture Module
Feed Flow Rate (F)         : 1500.00 Nm3/h (18.590 mol/s)
Feed / Permeate Pressure   : 3.50 bar a / 0.20 bar a (ratio = 0.057)
Permeance & Selectivity    : 300.0 GPU (alpha = 40.0)
Feed Fast Gas Mole Fraction: 0.140
Target Stage Cut (theta)   : 15.00 %
-----------------------------------------------------------------
REQUIRED MEMBRANE AREA (Am): 172.74 m2
Permeate Flow Rate         : 225.00 Nm3/h (Fast Gas Purity = 25.20 %)
Retentate Flow Rate        : 1275.00 Nm3/h (Slow Gas Purity = 87.98 %)
Fast Gas Recovery in Perm  : 27.00 %
Slow Gas Recovery in Retent: 86.95 %
Specific Permeate Flux     : 1.303 Nm3/(m2.h)
=================================================================

📘 Calculation Methodology & Membrane Technology Standards

Solution-Diffusion Mechanism

Gas transport through dense polymeric membrane skins is governed by Fickian diffusion driven by partial pressure gradients between the shell and fiber lumen:

JA = QA · (Ph xA − Pl yA)

Purity vs Recovery Trade-Off

Increasing stage cut $\theta$ increases fast-gas recovery but dilutes permeate purity as local driving force decreases along the fiber length.

Key Engineering Assumptions

  • 1 GPU = $10^{-6}\,\text{cm}^3(STP)/(\text{cm}^2\cdot s\cdot\text{cmHg}) = 3.348\times 10^{-10}\,\text{mol/(m}^2\cdot\text{s}\cdot\text{Pa)}$.
  • Ideal gas behaviour ($22.414\,\text{L/mol}$ at STP).
  • Cross-flow hollow fiber configuration with negligible lumen pressure drop.