🚿 Impinging Jet Array Heat Transfer (Martin)
Compute impinging round nozzle array Nusselt number (Nu_avg), convective heat transfer coefficient (h), stagnation peak flux, and orifice pressure drop using Martin (1977) correlation.
⚡ Fortran 90 Engine
Double Precision (IEEE 754)
✓ ISO / ASME Validated
📊 Solver Telemetry
● ACTIVE
👁️ Consultations
39
⚡ Calculs faits
30
💾 Téléchargements
297
📦 Code Fortran
10.8 KB
📅 Mise en service
Jun 2026
⏱️ Latence
< 1 ms
🚿 Array of Impinging Nozzle Jets & Stagnation Cooling Layer
Real-time visual simulation of vertical high-speed fluid jets, target impingement spots & radial wall-jet spread📝 Configuration & Presets
Martin (1977) Array Formulation:
• Area Fraction: f = (π/4) / (S/d)²
• Average Nusselt: Nu = 2√f · [ (1 − 2.2√f) / (1 + 0.2(H/d − 6)√f) ] · 2 Re0.5 (1 + 0.005 Re0.55)0.5 Pr0.42
• Heat Flux: q″ = havg · (Ts − Tj) [kW/m²]
• Orifice Drop: ΔP ≈ 0.75 · ρ Uj² [kPa]
• Area Fraction: f = (π/4) / (S/d)²
• Average Nusselt: Nu = 2√f · [ (1 − 2.2√f) / (1 + 0.2(H/d − 6)√f) ] · 2 Re0.5 (1 + 0.005 Re0.55)0.5 Pr0.42
• Heat Flux: q″ = havg · (Ts − Tj) [kW/m²]
• Orifice Drop: ΔP ≈ 0.75 · ρ Uj² [kPa]
📊 Jet Impingement Results
📊 Output Summary
Average Heat Transfer Coeff (havg)
h = 193 W/(m²·K) (Peak = 267)
Average Heat Flux: -11.6 kW/m² | Nuavg = 27.6
Red = 3,542
Stagnation Peak Nusselt (Nu₀)
38.1
Average Nu = 27.6
Nozzle Area Fraction (f)
3.14 %
S/d = 5.0
Jet Discharge Pressure Drop
0.26 kPa
0.003 bar
Standoff Aspect Ratio (H/d)
5.00
Prandtl Pr = 0.70
📈 Average Nusselt Number Nu vs Jet Velocity U_j (m/s)
📉 Heat Transfer Coeff h [W/(m²·K)] vs Standoff H/d
================================================================= THERMOFLUIDCALC — IMPINGING JET ARRAY REPORT (MARTIN MODEL) ================================================================= Case Title : Continuous Paper / Textile Drying Hot Air Impingement Array Geometry : d = 5.00 mm, S = 25.0 mm (S/d = 5.0), H = 25.0 mm (H/d = 5.0) Discharge Conditions : U_jet = 20.00 m/s, Re_d = 3542, Pr = 0.70, Area Fraction f = 3.14% Thermal Conditions : Target Ts = 120.0 C, Jet Tj = 180.0 C (DeltaT = 60.0 C) ----------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE NUSSELT (Nu_avg) : 27.63 STAGNATION PEAK NUSSELT : 38.08 AVERAGE HTC (h_avg) : 193.4 W/(m2.K) PEAK STAGNATION HTC (h_0) : 266.5 W/(m2.K) AVERAGE HEAT FLUX (q") : -11.61 kW/m2 Nozzle Pressure Drop DeltaP: 0.26 kPa (0.0026 bar) =================================================================
📘 Calculation Methodology & Martin Impingement Standards
Martin (1977) Correlation
The standard correlation accounts for the interaction between neighboring jet fountains and cross-flow spent fluid resistance in periodic nozzle arrays:
Nu = 2√f · [ (1 − 2.2√f) / (1 + 0.2(H/d − 6)√f) ] · F(Re) · Pr0.42
Stagnation vs Wall-Jet Zone
Peak heat transfer occurs directly beneath the nozzle center ($Nu_0$). In arrays, spent cross-flow deflects outer jets and moderates area-averaged performance.
Key Engineering Assumptions
- Square or hexagonal array of sharp-edged circular orifice nozzles.
- Validity range: $2000 \le Re_d \le 100,000$, $0.004 \le f \le 0.04$, $2 \le H/d \le 12$.
- Constant fluid thermophysical properties at film temperature.