🚿 Impinging Jet Array Heat Transfer (Martin)

Compute impinging round nozzle array Nusselt number (Nu_avg), convective heat transfer coefficient (h), stagnation peak flux, and orifice pressure drop using Martin (1977) correlation.

⚡ Fortran 90 Engine Double Precision (IEEE 754) ✓ ISO / ASME Validated
📊 Solver Telemetry ● ACTIVE
👁️ Consultations 39
⚡ Calculs faits 30
💾 Téléchargements 297 📦 Code Fortran 10.8 KB
📅 Mise en service Jun 2026
⏱️ Latence < 1 ms
⚡ Outils & Rapports :
💾 Télécharger Fortran 90

🚿 Array of Impinging Nozzle Jets & Stagnation Cooling Layer

Real-time visual simulation of vertical high-speed fluid jets, target impingement spots & radial wall-jet spread

📝 Configuration & Presets

💻 CPU Micro-Jet Array 🔥 Turbine Vane Impingement 🌊 Steel Water Jet Quench 📜 Industrial Paper Dryer
📐 Nozzle Array Geometry
🌡️ Thermal Boundary Conditions
💧 Fluid Thermophysical Properties
Martin (1977) Array Formulation:
• Area Fraction: f = (π/4) / (S/d)²
• Average Nusselt: Nu = 2√f · [ (1 − 2.2√f) / (1 + 0.2(H/d − 6)√f) ] · 2 Re0.5 (1 + 0.005 Re0.55)0.5 Pr0.42
• Heat Flux: q″ = havg · (Ts − Tj) [kW/m²]
• Orifice Drop: ΔP ≈ 0.75 · ρ Uj² [kPa]

📊 Jet Impingement Results

📊 Output Summary
💾 Fortran Source

Average Heat Transfer Coeff (havg)
h = 193 W/(m²·K) (Peak = 267)
Average Heat Flux: -11.6 kW/m² | Nuavg = 27.6
Red = 3,542
Stagnation Peak Nusselt (Nu₀) 38.1 Average Nu = 27.6
Nozzle Area Fraction (f) 3.14 % S/d = 5.0
Jet Discharge Pressure Drop 0.26 kPa 0.003 bar
Standoff Aspect Ratio (H/d) 5.00 Prandtl Pr = 0.70

📈 Average Nusselt Number Nu vs Jet Velocity U_j (m/s)

📉 Heat Transfer Coeff h [W/(m²·K)] vs Standoff H/d

=================================================================
 THERMOFLUIDCALC — IMPINGING JET ARRAY REPORT (MARTIN MODEL)
=================================================================
Case Title                 : Continuous Paper / Textile Drying Hot Air Impingement
Array Geometry             : d = 5.00 mm, S = 25.0 mm (S/d = 5.0), H = 25.0 mm (H/d = 5.0)
Discharge Conditions       : U_jet = 20.00 m/s, Re_d = 3542, Pr = 0.70, Area Fraction f = 3.14%
Thermal Conditions         : Target Ts = 120.0 C, Jet Tj = 180.0 C (DeltaT = 60.0 C)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
AVERAGE NUSSELT (Nu_avg)   : 27.63
STAGNATION PEAK NUSSELT    : 38.08
AVERAGE HTC (h_avg)        : 193.4 W/(m2.K)
PEAK STAGNATION HTC (h_0)  : 266.5 W/(m2.K)
AVERAGE HEAT FLUX (q")     : -11.61 kW/m2
Nozzle Pressure Drop DeltaP: 0.26 kPa (0.0026 bar)
=================================================================

📘 Calculation Methodology & Martin Impingement Standards

Martin (1977) Correlation

The standard correlation accounts for the interaction between neighboring jet fountains and cross-flow spent fluid resistance in periodic nozzle arrays:

Nu = 2√f · [ (1 − 2.2√f) / (1 + 0.2(H/d − 6)√f) ] · F(Re) · Pr0.42

Stagnation vs Wall-Jet Zone

Peak heat transfer occurs directly beneath the nozzle center ($Nu_0$). In arrays, spent cross-flow deflects outer jets and moderates area-averaged performance.

Key Engineering Assumptions

  • Square or hexagonal array of sharp-edged circular orifice nozzles.
  • Validity range: $2000 \le Re_d \le 100,000$, $0.004 \le f \le 0.04$, $2 \le H/d \le 12$.
  • Constant fluid thermophysical properties at film temperature.