βš™οΈ Pump Affinity Laws

Predict performance changes in centrifugal pumps due to rotation speed variations or impeller trim diameter modifications. Overlays original and scaled Q-H curves.

⚑ Fortran 90 Engine Double Precision (IEEE 754) βœ“ ISO / ASME Validated
πŸ“Š Solver Telemetry ● ACTIVE
πŸ‘οΈ Consultations 4,032
⚑ Calculs faits 3,178
πŸ’Ύ TΓ©lΓ©chargements 428
πŸ“¦ Code Fortran 11 KB
πŸ“… Mise en service Jun 2026
⏱️ Latence < 1 ms

πŸ“‹ Sizing Inputs

Units: SI Metric (mΒ³/h, m, kW)

πŸ“Š Scaling Performance Results

Original (Before)

Flow Rate ($Q_1$): β€”
Pump Head ($H_1$): β€”
Shaft Power ($P_1$): β€”
NPSH Required: β€”
Efficiency ($\eta_1$): β€”

Predicted (After)

Flow Rate ($Q_2$): β€”
Pump Head ($H_2$): β€”
Shaft Power ($P_2$): β€”
NPSH Required: β€”
Efficiency ($\eta_2$): β€”

Affinity Laws Active

Calculations are within standard valid regimes.

πŸ“ˆ Operating Point & Curve Overlay

πŸ“˜ Calculation Methodology: Centrifugal Pump Affinity Laws

Mathematical Model & Theory

The affinity laws govern centrifugal pump performance scaling when modifying rotational speed $N$ or trimming impeller diameter $D$:

$$\frac{Q_1}{Q_2} = \left(\frac{N_1}{N_2}\right)\left(\frac{D_1}{D_2}\right), \quad \frac{H_1}{H_2} = \left(\frac{N_1}{N_2}\right)^2\left(\frac{D_1}{D_2}\right)^2, \quad \frac{P_1}{P_2} = \left(\frac{N_1}{N_2}\right)^3\left(\frac{D_1}{D_2}\right)^3$$

Assumptions

  • Geometric and kinematic similarity maintained across operating speeds.
  • Constant hydraulic efficiency across modest speed/diameter trimming adjustments ($\pm 20\%$).

Academic References

  1. Karassik, I. J. et al.: Pump Handbook, McGraw-Hill.
  2. Stepanoff, A. J.: Centrifugal and Axial Flow Pumps, Krieger.

Worked Engineering Example

Problem Statement:
A pump operating at $N_1 = 1750\text{ RPM}$ delivers $Q_1 = 100\text{ m}^3/\text{h}$ at head $H_1 = 40\text{ m}$ consuming $P_1 = 15\text{ kW}$. Find performance if driven by a VFD at $N_2 = 1400\text{ RPM}$.

Step-by-step Solution:
1. Speed ratio: $\alpha = 1400 / 1750 = 0.80$.
2. $Q_2 = 100 \times 0.80 = 80.0\text{ m}^3/\text{h}$.
3. $H_2 = 40 \times (0.80)^2 = 40 \times 0.64 = 25.6\text{ m}$.
4. $P_2 = 15 \times (0.80)^3 = 15 \times 0.512 = 7.68\text{ kW}$.
Final Result:
At 1400 RPM: $Q = \mathbf{80\text{ m}^3/h}$, Head = $\mathbf{25.6\text{ m}}$, Power = $\mathbf{7.68\text{ kW}}$ (48.8% power savings).
ο»Ώ